Every review criterion explained, with examples, evidence rules, and common mistakes.
This Student Guide walks through every review criterion for the NRI Real-World Economic Investigation track — from surveys and expert interviews to literature research, focus groups, synthesis, and applied economic recommendations. Each module explains what reviewers look for, what evidence is required, and how to conduct credible real-world economic investigation.
Hover a module to read it directly
Understanding the problem you're solving and the context behind your project.
Understanding the problem you're solving and the context behind your project.
The core submission process specific to your track and its review criteria.
The core submission process specific to your track and its review criteria.
Refining your work through testing, feedback, and iterative improvement.
Refining your work through testing, feedback, and iterative improvement.
Articulating the value, impact, and originality of your project.
Articulating the value, impact, and originality of your project.
Organizing your team's work, timeline, and resources effectively.
Organizing your team's work, timeline, and resources effectively.
Building a productive and accountable team environment.
Building a productive and accountable team environment.
Making sense of what you learned from the full project experience.
Making sense of what you learned from the full project experience.
Working with integrity, respecting ethical boundaries, and using AI responsibly.
Working with integrity, respecting ethical boundaries, and using AI responsibly.
Preparing your final submission and presenting your work through media.
Preparing your final submission and presenting your work through media.
“A comprehensive review-criterion guide for the NIM Real-World Economic Investigation track.”
This guide covers all review criteria across 9 sections of the NRI Real-World Economic Investigation submission. Each module explains the scope rules, evidence requirements, and specific mistakes that cost points — in language students can act on before they write.
Conducting a survey is not the same as collecting valid survey data. The instrument design, response format, and sampling approach determine what claims the data can support.
Reviewers assess survey quality at the instrument level, not just the execution level. A poorly designed instrument produces data that cannot support the claims students want to make — even if the survey was carefully conducted.
Next Idea Matters (NIM) is LearningFirst's flagship project-based competition program. The NIM Student and Advisor Guides translate each track's evaluation standards into clear, actionable guidance that helps students produce work reviewers can assess with confidence.
Ranked by semantic similarity
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.
Coaching prompts, common student mistakes, and intervention strategies for every review criterion.